Disney agrees to $50M class action settlement over streaming TV price claims – Class Action Lawsuits
According to the motion seeking preliminary approval of the deal, YouTube TV and DirecTV Stream subscribers claim Disney used anticompetitive carriage agreements that forced streaming service providers to include expensive ESPN channels in their packages, driving up subscription prices for consumers.
The proposed settlement would establish a $50 million nonreversionary fund to compensate class members who allegedly paid higher subscription prices as a result of Disney’s conduct.
The settlement classes include individuals who purchased a YouTube TV or DirecTV streaming live pay television subscription from April 1, 2019, through the date of preliminary approval.
Plaintiffs allege Disney required streaming live pay TV providers to carry a bundle of Disney networks, including ESPN channels, as a condition of offering Disney programming. The Disney antitrust lawsuit claims these agreements prevented streaming services from offering lower-cost packages that excluded ESPN channels.
Subscribers argued that Disney’s conduct restricted competition in the streaming live pay television market and caused consumers to pay inflated prices for their subscriptions.
In addition to monetary relief, the proposed settlement includes injunctive provisions intended to address the alleged anticompetitive practices.
Under the agreement, Disney would be required to consider proposals from streaming live pay TV providers that allow them to offer subscription packages with fewer Disney networks. These packages could potentially exclude ESPN channels, giving streaming services greater flexibility when negotiating carriage agreements.
The injunctive relief would remain in effect for three years following final court approval of the settlement.
The Disney class action lawsuit previously included claims from a proposed class of FuboTV subscribers, but those claims were separated after a court determined there was a conflict involving the attorneys representing different subscriber groups.
What do you think of this Disney class action settlement? Let us know in the comments.
The YouTube and DirecTV stream classes are represented by Yavar Bathaee, Andrew C. Wolinsky, Priscilla Ghita, Allison J. Watson, Brian J. Dunne, Edward M. Grauman, Kaki J. Johnson and Bryce W. Talbot of Bathaee Dunne LLP.
The Disney streaming antitrust class action lawsuit is Biddle, et al. v. The Walt Disney Co., Case No. 5:22-cv-07317, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
"*" indicates required fields
Me too
Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *
"*" indicates required fields
Me too
Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *
Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.
"*" indicates required fields
@2026 Top Class Actions. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
source
This article was autogenerated from a news feed from CDO TIMES selected high quality news and research sources. There was no editorial review conducted beyond that by CDO TIMES staff. Need help with any of the topics in our articles? Schedule your free CDO TIMES Tech Navigator call today to stay ahead of the curve and gain insider advantages to propel your business!
Turn insight into action with CDO TIMES.
CDO TIMES helps executives move from AI awareness to AI execution through practical frameworks, tools, executive research, and advisory support.
Explore the Frameworks
Continue with Enterprise AI 2030, HI + AI = ECI, AI Governance, and executive playbooks.
Explore Enterprise AI 2030 →Use the Free Tools
Assess readiness, estimate AI ROI, model AI costs, and prioritize AI initiatives.
Open Executive Tools →Read the Book
Explore the HI + AI = ECI leadership model in The AI-Ready Leader.
Order The AI-Ready Leader →Go deeper with CDO TIMES Pro.
Unlock premium research, executive playbooks, templates, advanced tools, and member-only briefings.
Need executive help?
Explore advisory, workshops, fractional CIO/CDO/CISO/CAIO support, and AI operating model design.
Explore Advisory →Attend executive events
Join leadership forums, executive dinners, webinars, and strategic AI briefings.
View Events →Build AI capability
Use CDO TIMES Academy for executive learning, AI leadership development, and implementation training.
Explore Academy →

