"Wait, Did I Just Hear That Right?": Suze Orman Catches a Caller's Advisor Overcharging Her by $23,000 a Year – 24/7 Wall St.

Personal Finance
Suze Orman caught that Anna’s reported $35,000 annual fee on $2 million is actually 1.75%, not the 0.60% her advisor quoted.
Orman concluded Anna has been seriously overcharged for years, paying roughly $23,000 more annually than her quoted rate would require.
Always verify your advisory fee as an actual dollar amount and confirm it matches the percentage quoted to catch hidden overcharges.
Many financial professionals are salespeople paid on what they push, not whether you end up wealthier. A fiduciary is the opposite. The SEC legally requires them to put your interests first. Advisor.com’s free matching tool pairs you with vetted fiduciaries from major national firms, all in under three minutes. See who you match with today.
Sending You to Google News in 3
© jacoblund / iStock
When a listener named Anna wrote in to Suze Orman’s Women & Money podcast, she thought she was asking a simple question about whether to fire her financial advisor. Instead, Orman stopped mid-sentence and caught something Anna had apparently missed for years: the numbers did not add up.
Anna laid out her situation clearly. Retired at 57, she has $2 million in a traditional IRA that she is converting to a Roth over 13 years, deliberately staying in the 22% to 24% tax bracket. Her advisor, she said, “charges 0.60%, which is about $35,000 a year,” and in return manages individual equities, keeps cash reserves, and helps with tax planning on the conversion. A self-described low-cost index fund believer, Anna wanted to know when it makes sense to switch to self-management or a flat-fee platform like Range.
Orman never got to the strategy question, because the first number stopped her cold.
Orman replayed the caller’s setup out loud, catching the mismatch as she said it: “Wait, wait, did I just hear that right? She has $2 million. She’s paying $35,000 a year, and supposedly all he charges is 0.60%.”
Then she did the math on the spot. “0.60 on $2 million is not $35,000. $35,000 a year on $2 million, Katie, is a 1.75% advisory fee. That is way, way too much. So something is radically wrong there, Anna.”
That gap is the whole story. Anna believed she was paying a reasonable 0.6%, a rate in line with what many fee-conscious investors consider fair. The dollar figure she reported, $35,000 a year, points to something far higher. Either the percentage is wrong or the dollars are, and either way, Orman’s message was that Anna needed answers immediately.
Her advice was blunt and repeated for emphasis. “You have to go to him and say, why am I paying $35,000 a year just for you to manage individual equity and keep cash reserves and do some tax planning. That is ridiculous. That is ridiculous. That is ridiculous.”
Anna’s question about Range, a flat-fee platform, gave Orman a chance to weigh the two models. Range charges roughly $4,000 to $20,000 per year depending on the services involved. That can be dramatically cheaper than a percentage-based arrangement on a large balance, but Orman flagged a tradeoff.
“There is no incentive really for them to make you more money,” she said of flat-fee providers. She contrasted that with an advisor paid as a percentage of assets: “They do better when you do better. Just that simple.” When your account grows, so does their fee, which at least aligns their paycheck with your results.
That alignment only matters, though, if the percentage is reasonable in the first place. And here Orman circled back to the number that started it all. “0.60% on $2 million is only about $12,000 a year, which is essentially what you would be paying at Range for full services anyway. And you already know this advisor.”
In other words, if Anna is truly being charged 0.6%, she is already close to flat-fee pricing and has a relationship in place. If she is actually paying $35,000, she is being charged something closer to 1.8%, and that is a very different conversation.
Orman’s final verdict left no room for doubt: “I think you have been seriously overcharged. For a long time.”
Anna’s story is a warning that applies far beyond one caller. Advisory fees are often quoted as a small-sounding percentage, but on a large balance, that percentage becomes real money, year after year, quietly compounding against you. The single most useful thing any investor can do is exactly what Orman told Anna to do: find out the actual dollar amount you pay, confirm the percentage it represents, and ask what you are getting for it.
Pull your most recent statement. Locate the fee line. Match it against the percentage you were quoted. If the two do not line up, that is your next phone call.
A fee that sounds tiny can hide a bill that is anything but. Anna assumed 0.60%. The dollars told a different story. And until she asks the question Orman handed her, she will not know which number is the truth, or how much it has already cost her.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
I’ve spent more than 15 years inside enterprise software, working alongside the finance, sales operations, and HR leaders who run the revenue engines at some of the largest tech companies in the country.
My day job is helping enterprise executives make smarter decisions about retention, compensation, and growth. These are the same operational levers that show up in every earnings report investors actually read. That perspective shapes my writing for 24/7 Wall St.
The headline numbers are easy. The interesting stuff is underneath: how companies make money, what executives are worried about, and what any of it means for the person checking their 401(k) on a Sunday afternoon. I write about personal finance and business as someone who has spent her career inside the rooms where these decisions get made.
Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.
On the June 11, 2026 episode of Suze Orman’s Women & Money, titled “Caution, Caution, Caution!”, a 54-year-old caller laid…
Two weeks after her 52-year-old husband died unexpectedly, a 54-year-old woman called Suze Orman’s podcast with the question hundreds of…
On the May 17 episode of her podcast, “Why Friendship Isn’t a Financial Plan,” Suze Orman told the story of…
When it comes to money, none of us are perfect. We’ve all spent money on the most ridiculous things. But…
Adam Grossman, the Boston-based financial advisor who founded Mayport, sat down with Christine Benz on Morningstar’s The Long View and…
Suze Orman is a well-known financial advisor, author, and podcast host who offers helpful financial advice — especially to women.…
The dilemma in the headline came from a guest on the How to Money podcast, episode #1139, where late starter…
Most Americans are not prepared for a financial emergency. In fact, according to a Bankrate survey, 47% of Americans don’t…
A Pennsylvania caller named Bill landed on a tipping logic that is hard to argue with on pure labor grounds,…

source
This article was autogenerated from a news feed from CDO TIMES selected high quality news and research sources. There was no editorial review conducted beyond that by CDO TIMES staff. Need help with any of the topics in our articles? Schedule your free CDO TIMES Tech Navigator call today to stay ahead of the curve and gain insider advantages to propel your business!