Who Got the Work: Keker to Represent LinkedIn in Pending Health Data Privacy Class Action – Law.com

Law.com Products & Resources
Tools
Account
Sign in to access your account and subscription
Tools
Regions
Topics
Resources
Top News
Resources
Other
Publication
Legaltech News
Reporting, and expert analysis of legal technology with a focus onwhat legal departments, law firms, and tech companies need to know
Surveys & Rankings
Market hubs
Other
Ranking
The 2025 Am Law 100 Rankings
The Am Law 100 is the definitive ranking of the 100 largest law firms in the United States.
Tool
Law.com Compass
Dynamically explore and compare data on law firms, companies, individual lawyers, and industry trends.
Tool
Law.com Radar
Real-time alerts on new state and federal litigation, plus unlimited complaint access, expert case summaries and AI-enhanced trend detection.
Pro
Membership Communities
Public Notices
Resources
Flora Morgan, an associate at Keker, Van Nest & Peters, entered an appearance on behalf of LinkedIn Corp. on Nov. 7 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Font Size
Keker, Van Nest & Peters has stepped in to defend LinkedIn in a privacy suit, which—along with a slate of other pending class actions in California federal court—accuses the professional social networking site of using its pixel-tracking technology to illegally intercept users’ sensitive data from a health care website for its own targeted advertising purposes.
Already a part of the community? Sign In Now.
Is one article a month not enough? Subscribe today to unlock premium access to all the in-depth analysis and breaking news on critical legal issues from Law.com.
*May exclude premium content.
Font Size
Page printed from:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
The rulemaking process highlighted tensions with regulating this evolving area of the law, most notably with respect to artificial intelligence technologies
The case was the first enforcement action under Connecticut’s Student Data Privacy Law and California’s K-12 Pupil Online Personal Information Protection Act. Along with New York, all three states’ student privacy laws require online educational providers to have adequate protections and security measures for education data.
The California Privacy Protection Agency’s $1.35 million settlement with Tractor Supply Co. marked the first completed enforcement action addressing job applicants’ privacy rights.
In a tentative ruling Wednesday, U.S. District Judge George Wu said he would reject TikTok’s motion to stay the lawsuits alleging privacy violations against users under 13.
Privacy attorneys say that the enforcement action, which is the first in the state to allege violations of the Florida Digital Bill of Rights, may have sweeping implications for Big Tech and children’s privacy industry practices throughout the United States.
The industry-leading media platform offering competitive intelligence to prepare for today and anticipate opportunities for future success.

As a part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters.
Law.com
Publications
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
RSS Feed

source
This article was autogenerated from a news feed from CDO TIMES selected high quality news and research sources. There was no editorial review conducted beyond that by CDO TIMES staff. Need help with any of the topics in our articles? Schedule your free CDO TIMES Tech Navigator call today to stay ahead of the curve and gain insider advantages to propel your business!