Impact of 2024 Election on Tech Policies and Innovation
By Carsten Krause, November 1st, 2024
In an increasingly digital world, technology policies have far-reaching implications across industries, national security, and individual privacy. The upcoming election presents voters with two distinct technology policy approaches from the Harris-Walz and Trump campaigns, each reflecting a different vision for the role of government in regulating and advancing technology. This analysis explores each platform’s stance on critical tech issues, including data privacy, artificial intelligence (AI), cybersecurity, digital infrastructure, and workforce development, providing readers with a detailed comparison.
Technology Policy Comparisons: Harris-Walz vs. Trump
The following table offers a side-by-side view of the technology policies proposed by the Harris-Walz and Trump campaigns, covering the major areas that impact business, security, and individual freedoms.
| Policy Area | Harris-Walz Technology Plan | Trump Technology Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Data Privacy | Proposes GDPR-style data protection laws to safeguard consumer data, focusing on transparency, consent, and accountability. The policy aims to strengthen individual privacy rights and limit corporate data collection and sharing (NIST). | Emphasizes minimal regulation to foster innovation and reduce compliance burdens on businesses. Advocates for self-regulation in data privacy, relying on private sector accountability (Brookings). |
| Artificial Intelligence (AI) | Plans a $1 trillion investment by 2030 to advance ethical AI and AI-driven infrastructure, emphasizing AI safety, transparency, and responsible development standards. Proposes forming an independent AI oversight committee to ensure AI alignment with public values (NIST). | Supports rapid AI innovation with limited regulation, proposing public-private partnerships to encourage market-driven growth in AI. Emphasizes self-regulation over government-led standards in AI ethics and safety (CATO Institute). |
| Cybersecurity | Expands federal funding for national cybersecurity initiatives, with an emphasis on critical infrastructure protection, public-private partnerships, and workforce development in cybersecurity (CISA). | Focuses on boosting cybersecurity primarily through private sector initiatives, proposing fewer regulatory requirements but offering financial incentives for cybersecurity investments (Heritage Foundation). |
| Digital Infrastructure | Allocated $1.2 trillion through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to expand broadband, modernize public transit, and invest in smart city technology. Prioritizes closing the digital divide in rural areas (White House). | Emphasizes public-private partnerships to expand digital infrastructure with a focus on urban development and economic zones. Limited federal funding for rural broadband expansion, relying instead on market-driven solutions (Brookings). |
| 5G and Telecommunications | Supports federally coordinated 5G rollout to reduce network vulnerabilities, partnering with private companies to secure the supply chain and minimize reliance on foreign technology providers (FCC). | Prioritizes a hands-off approach, with less federal oversight in 5G deployment, favoring private companies to lead the infrastructure rollout. Opposes restrictions on international suppliers, including potential use of Chinese technology (CATO Institute). |
| Workforce Development in Tech | Proposes federal funding for tech education, including expanded STEM programs in K-12, free community college, and vocational training in AI and cybersecurity. Aims to bridge the skills gap by partnering with private tech companies (Ed.gov). | Emphasizes private sector-led workforce development, with tax incentives for companies that offer job training. Less focus on federal education programs, favoring apprenticeships and hands-on training in tech industries (Heritage Foundation). |
| Technology and Antitrust | Supports stricter antitrust regulations, particularly for large tech platforms, to prevent monopolistic practices and promote competition. Proposes FTC-led investigations and oversight (FTC). | Advocates for limited antitrust intervention, arguing that deregulation will promote innovation and benefit consumers. Believes market forces should address issues of competition in the tech sector (Brookings). |
Data Privacy: Differing Approaches to Consumer Protection
The Harris-Walz platform emphasizes data privacy protections modeled after the European Union’s GDPR, aiming to implement strict guidelines on data collection, storage, and usage by companies. This approach focuses on individual control over personal information, requiring businesses to obtain clear consent before collecting data and enforcing transparency on how data is shared. Additionally, the Harris-Walz team proposes creating a federal data privacy office to enforce these regulations and safeguard digital rights, making the U.S. a leader in digital privacy (NIST).
In contrast, the Trump campaign favors a hands-off approach, arguing that self-regulation by the private sector will allow for faster innovation without stifling compliance requirements. Trump’s platform emphasizes minimal government intervention, leaving companies free to develop their privacy policies based on consumer preferences. Proponents argue this approach fosters a competitive environment in which companies can develop unique privacy protections, though critics warn it could lead to inconsistent standards and increase data vulnerability (Brookings).
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Balancing Innovation and Ethics
Both campaigns recognize AI’s transformative potential, but they diverge significantly in their approach to regulation and ethical oversight. The Harris-Walz team plans a $1 trillion investment over the next decade to support ethical AI development, with funds allocated to AI safety research, bias mitigation, and AI-driven infrastructure projects. They propose establishing an independent AI oversight committee, which would work alongside private companies to develop industry standards for transparency, safety, and accountability. This approach aligns with calls from AI ethicists for government-backed frameworks to manage AI risks (NIST).
Conversely, Trump’s platform emphasizes rapid AI innovation with fewer regulatory restrictions, advocating for public-private partnerships that rely on the private sector to self-regulate AI development. Trump’s team argues that a light regulatory approach encourages AI-driven economic growth and international competitiveness. They oppose government-imposed ethical standards, viewing them as potential barriers to technological progress. This approach prioritizes market dynamics but raises questions about the oversight of AI’s societal impact (CATO Institute).
Cybersecurity: National Security and Public-Private Collaboration
Cybersecurity is a prominent concern for both platforms, though their strategies diverge on the role of government regulation. The Harris-Walz campaign proposes expanding federal funding for cybersecurity, particularly for critical infrastructure sectors like energy, water, and healthcare. They support public-private partnerships to enhance cybersecurity training and invest in national initiatives that protect critical digital assets. The Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) plays a central role in this approach, which aims to coordinate cybersecurity efforts across industries (CISA).
Trump’s platform, on the other hand, emphasizes private sector solutions to cybersecurity, advocating for a deregulated approach that reduces compliance costs for businesses. The campaign supports offering tax incentives for cybersecurity investments, encouraging companies to voluntarily improve their security measures. Critics, however, argue that without federal coordination, vulnerabilities could persist in areas critical to national security (Heritage Foundation).
Digital Infrastructure and 5G: Expanding Connectivity and Security
The Harris-Walz platform allocates $1.2 trillion for digital infrastructure under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, prioritizing broadband expansion, particularly in rural areas. This investment supports the development of smart city technology, public transit modernization, and efforts to close the digital divide. The administration also supports federal oversight in the 5G rollout to ensure network security and reduce dependency on foreign technology providers (White House).
In contrast, Trump’s platform advocates for private investment and public-private partnerships to develop digital infrastructure, favoring an urban-centric approach with fewer federal mandates. The Trump campaign opposes heavy restrictions on international 5G suppliers, arguing that this approach allows for faster deployment and lower costs. While this approach may accelerate 5G expansion, it also raises security concerns about reliance on foreign technology, particularly from Chinese suppliers (Brookings).
Workforce Development in Tech: Bridging the Skills Gap
The Harris-Walz campaign proposes significant federal investment in tech-focused workforce development. Their plan includes funding for STEM programs in K-12, free community college for qualifying students, and partnerships with private tech companies to offer AI and cybersecurity training. This initiative aims to bridge the skills gap and prepare the next generation for careers in technology and data-driven fields (Ed.gov).
Trump’s approach to workforce development relies on private sector-led training programs, offering tax incentives to companies that provide job training for new employees. This model emphasizes apprenticeships and hands-on experience over formal education, with less federal funding for education programs. The Trump campaign argues that the private sector can adapt training more quickly to changing tech needs, though some critics suggest it may limit access to education for lower-income individuals (Heritage Foundation).
Technology and Antitrust: Addressing Big Tech Power
The Harris-Walz platform supports stricter antitrust enforcement, particularly for large tech companies. Their approach includes empowering the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate monopolistic practices and potentially break up companies that inhibit competition. This stance responds to concerns that large tech platforms have outsized control over digital markets, impacting innovation and consumer choice (FTC).
In contrast, Trump’s platform advocates for a market-driven approach, limiting antitrust intervention to foster a competitive, innovative tech environment. Trump’s team argues that deregulation supports consumer benefit and that market forces will naturally address issues of competition. Critics caution that this approach may allow dominant tech firms to continue to consolidate power, affecting smaller competitors (Brookings).
Preparing for Either Presidency: Strategies for C-Level Business and Technology Leaders to Survive and Thrive
As the country stands at a technological and economic crossroads, C-level leaders must prepare to navigate the unique challenges and opportunities that could arise under a Harris-Walz or Trump administration. While the platforms differ significantly, proactive planning will help executives anticipate shifts in regulatory landscapes, investment climates, and workforce requirements. Here, we outline strategies for CIOs, CTOs, CISOs, and other business leaders to position their organizations to thrive regardless of the election outcome.
If Harris-Walz Wins: Prioritizing Compliance, Ethical AI, and Infrastructure Investments
The Harris-Walz platform focuses on strengthening data privacy regulations, investing in AI and digital infrastructure, and enforcing stricter antitrust policies. Their approach emphasizes ethical standards, transparency, and government-backed cybersecurity initiatives, creating an environment where regulatory compliance and responsible tech development are paramount.
1. Prepare for Enhanced Data Privacy Compliance
With proposed GDPR-style data protection laws, companies will need to be vigilant in managing consumer data, implementing stricter consent protocols, and ensuring transparency in data usage. C-level leaders can prepare by:
- Conducting data audits to identify where personal information is stored, how it’s used, and ensuring it complies with potential new federal regulations.
- Strengthening data governance frameworks to enhance internal controls over data collection, storage, and sharing, minimizing risks associated with regulatory breaches.
- Investing in privacy-enhancing technologies such as encryption and anonymization to meet heightened compliance standards.
2. Focus on Ethical and Responsible AI Development
Harris-Walz’s proposed investments in ethical AI and responsible AI oversight will require organizations to implement rigorous standards for transparency and safety in AI applications. Leaders should:
- Develop AI ethics guidelines tailored to their industry, ensuring transparency and accountability in AI deployment to avoid potential regulatory issues.
- Implement bias-mitigation tools in AI systems, using external audits or hiring experts to review AI models for biases that could lead to regulatory scrutiny.
- Engage in AI oversight partnerships by participating in collaborative frameworks or government-led AI initiatives that may be introduced.
3. Leverage Infrastructure and Workforce Investment Opportunities
With the Harris-Walz plan proposing substantial infrastructure investments and workforce development initiatives, businesses can benefit by:
- Taking advantage of federal grants and incentives for broadband expansion, green energy adoption, or smart city projects if these align with their strategic goals.
- Investing in upskilling programs to access federal funding for tech education, cybersecurity training, and STEM initiatives that align with Harris-Walz’s workforce development agenda.
- Building partnerships with educational institutions to ensure a steady pipeline of skilled workers, especially in AI, data analytics, and cybersecurity, where demand for talent is expected to rise.
If Trump Wins: Emphasizing Agility, Market-Driven Innovation, and Cybersecurity Self-Regulation
The Trump platform advocates for deregulation, self-regulation in data privacy, and a market-driven approach to AI development and digital infrastructure expansion. This environment encourages rapid innovation, limited government intervention, and a hands-off approach in cybersecurity, necessitating a different strategic focus.
1. Embrace Market-Driven Innovation and Speed-to-Market
Trump’s hands-off regulatory approach encourages companies to innovate without stringent compliance requirements, particularly in data management and AI development. Leaders can capitalize by:
- Accelerating R&D and product development cycles in areas like AI and machine learning, where fewer regulatory barriers could speed up innovation.
- Exploring new data-driven business models that leverage consumer insights more freely, taking advantage of the relaxed data privacy standards while balancing consumer trust.
- Adopting agile methodologies across the organization to enhance responsiveness to a dynamic, minimally regulated market environment.
2. Prepare for Limited Government Support in Cybersecurity
With an emphasis on private sector-led cybersecurity, organizations will need to prioritize self-regulation and internal defenses to protect against cyber threats. To address these challenges, leaders should:
- Invest heavily in cybersecurity resilience through advanced threat detection, response systems, and continuous monitoring to mitigate the risks of decreased federal oversight.
- Implement comprehensive incident response plans and regularly train employees on cybersecurity best practices, with a focus on protecting critical data assets.
- Explore cyber insurance policies as an additional layer of protection, preparing for a landscape where businesses are expected to be largely self-sufficient in managing cyber risks.
3. Capitalize on Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure
Trump’s emphasis on public-private partnerships for digital infrastructure development presents opportunities for companies involved in technology, telecommunications, and construction. C-level leaders can:
- Engage in partnerships with local governments to pursue infrastructure projects, especially in 5G deployment, where federal support may be limited but market demand is high.
- Prioritize urban market expansion in alignment with Trump’s focus on economic zones, which could attract investment and tax incentives under the administration’s approach.
- Consider investments in smart city technologies and IoT solutions that align with private-sector infrastructure growth initiatives, particularly in fast-growing metropolitan areas.
Cross-Administration Strategies: Resilience and Adaptability in a Rapidly Evolving Tech Landscape
Regardless of the election outcome, certain strategies will remain essential for businesses to succeed in a technology-driven economy. Here are key actions that leaders should consider to stay adaptable and resilient, no matter which administration comes into office:
1. Build Robust Data Governance and Security Frameworks
As both platforms place a high value on digital security—albeit with different approaches—C-level executives should reinforce internal data governance and cybersecurity measures. Creating a flexible framework that meets baseline compliance while adapting to specific federal or self-regulated standards will help mitigate risks in any regulatory environment.
2. Invest in Workforce Flexibility and Tech Talent Development
With a clear skills gap in technology fields, leaders must continue investing in tech talent. Whether through partnerships with educational institutions or in-house training, a well-trained workforce will be crucial for adopting emerging technologies like AI, cybersecurity, and cloud computing, all of which will remain priorities under both administrations.
3. Develop a Proactive Policy and Regulatory Response Team
Building a team dedicated to tracking policy developments and adapting to regulatory changes will allow organizations to stay compliant and leverage new opportunities. This approach enables leaders to react swiftly to federal or self-regulated environments, ensuring that they remain competitive while protecting against legal and compliance risks.
4. Engage with Industry Groups and Advisory Councils
Participation in industry groups and tech advisory councils can provide valuable insights and advocacy opportunities as federal and state regulations evolve. Engaging in dialogue with policymakers and staying informed on regulatory shifts will help companies stay ahead of emerging standards and prepare for potential legislative changes impacting tech.
The CDO TIMES Bottom Line: Competing Visions for America’s Digital Future
As the 2024 election approaches, C-level leaders are facing a unique period of uncertainty and opportunity. Whether the U.S. adopts the Harris-Walz model of regulated growth and ethical technology, or Trump’s market-driven, innovation-first approach, flexibility and proactive planning will be essential for businesses to thrive. Preparing now with a strategic mix of compliance, innovation, and investment in workforce development will position organizations to not only survive but excel in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
The Harris-Walz and Trump platforms present contrasting views on technology policy, with each prioritizing different approaches to data privacy, AI ethics, cybersecurity, and workforce development. The Harris-Walz plan reflects a vision of government-backed investment in technology and a commitment to regulating emerging tech to protect consumer rights, enhance cybersecurity, and promote fair competition. In contrast, Trump’s approach favors market-driven innovation, emphasizing minimal regulation, self-regulation, and partnerships with the private sector.
As technology continues to reshape the economy, society, and individual lives, these policy distinctions will have significant implications for business leaders, policymakers, and American competitiveness. CDO TIMES provides this analysis to support informed decision-making among our readers, recognizing the importance of tech policy in determining the future direction of the United States in a global digital landscape.
Love this article? Embrace the full potential and become an esteemed full access member, experiencing the exhilaration of unlimited access to captivating articles, exclusive non-public content, empowering hands-on guides, and transformative training material. Unleash your true potential today!
Order the AI + HI = ECI book by Carsten Krause today! at cdotimes.com/book
Subscribe on LinkedIn: Digital Insider
Become a paid subscriber for unlimited access, exclusive content, no ads: CDO TIMES
Do You Need Help?
Consider bringing on a fractional CIO, CISO, CDO or CAIO from CDO TIMES Leadership as a Service. The expertise of CDO TIMES becomes indispensable for organizations striving to stay ahead in the digital transformation journey. Here are some compelling reasons to engage their experts:
- Deep Expertise: CDO TIMES has a team of experts with deep expertise in the field of Cybersecurity, Digital, Data and AI and its integration into business processes. This knowledge ensures that your organization can leverage digital and AI in the most optimal and innovative ways.
- Strategic Insight: Not only can the CDO TIMES team help develop a Digital & AI strategy, but they can also provide insights into how this strategy fits into your overall business model and objectives. They understand that every business is unique, and so should be its Digital & AI strategy.
- Future-Proofing: With CDO TIMES, organizations can ensure they are future-proofed against rapid technological changes. Our experts stay abreast of the latest AI, Data and digital advancements and can guide your organization to adapt and evolve as the technology does.
- Risk Management: Implementing a Digital & AI strategy is not without its risks. The CDO TIMES can help identify potential pitfalls and develop mitigation strategies, helping you avoid costly mistakes and ensuring a smooth transition with fractional CISO services.
- Competitive Advantage: Finally, by hiring CDO TIMES experts, you are investing in a competitive advantage. Their expertise can help you speed up your innovation processes, bring products to market faster, and stay ahead of your competitors.
By employing the expertise of CDO TIMES, organizations can navigate the complexities of digital innovation with greater confidence and foresight, setting themselves up for success in the rapidly evolving digital economy. The future is digital, and with CDO TIMES, you’ll be well-equipped to lead in this new frontier.
Do you need help with your digital transformation initiatives? We provide fractional CAIO, CDO, CISO and CIO services, do a Preliminary ECI and Tech Navigator Assessment and we will help you drive results and deliver winning digital and AI strategies for you!
Subscribe now for free and never miss out on digital insights delivered right to your inbox!
